top of page
Search

What startups should think about when hiring a Chair

  • 23 hours ago
  • 4 min read


For many startups, hiring a Non-Executive Chair marks a turning point. The company is growing. Investors are around the table. Decisions are becoming bigger and more complex.

 

But appointing a Chair isn’t just a governance milestone. It’s a strategic hire that can shape how a company scales. Done well, the Chair becomes one of the most valuable partners a founder/CEO has. Done poorly, it can create confusion around leadership, board dynamics, and decision-making.

 

From working with scaleups across the tech ecosystem, here are some key considerations for startups before appointing a Non-Executive Chair.



Start with the “why”
 

The first question startups should ask is simple:

 

Why do we actually need a Chair?

 

Too often, the role is created because it feels like the next step. The strongest chair appointments usually happen when a company reaches a specific inflection point, such as:

 

  • The board becomes more complex

  • The company raises larger funding rounds

  • Founders want a trusted strategic sounding board

  • Board meetings need structure and stronger facilitation

  • Investors want stronger governance

 

The role should solve a real problem.

 

If the board is small and working effectively with a lead investor, you may not need a Chair yet.

 

 

The Chair leads the board - not the business
 

One of the biggest misconceptions about the role is that the Chair is a senior executive.

 

They’re not.

 

The Chair runs the board, not the company. Their responsibilities typically include:

 

  • Setting board agendas

  • Facilitating balanced discussion

  • Ensuring decisions are well-tested

  • Supporting, mentoring, and challenging the CEO

  • Managing board dynamics and governance

 

What they shouldn’t do is step into operational leadership or undermine the CEO.

 

The best Chairs strengthen the board’s effectiveness while leaving management firmly in charge.

 

 

The Chair–CEO relationship matters more than anything

 

In practice, the most important relationship in a company’s governance structure is between the Chair and the CEO.

 

At their best, Chairs become:

 

  • A trusted sounding board

  • A coach during difficult decisions

  • A bridge between investors and management

 

For many founder-CEOs, this becomes the most valuable external relationship they have. But it only works if:

 

  • The CEO trusts the Chair

  • The Chair respects the CEO’s authority

  • Expectations are aligned from the start

 

Credentials matter. But chemistry matters just as much.

 

 

Governance is a skill (not just operating experience)

 

Many startups assume that hiring a successful former CEO automatically makes someone a great Chair. But chairing a board is a different job. It requires skills such as:

 

  • Facilitating discussion between strong personalities

  • Managing investor dynamics

  • Keeping board conversations strategic

  • Ensuring governance without slowing execution

 

People who have served on multiple boards often bring the strongest governance instincts.


The best Chairs typically combine operating credibility with board leadership experience.

 

 

Independence is critical

 

A strong Chair needs to be able to act in the interests of the company as a whole.


That usually means they are:

 

  • Independent of any single investor

  • Not part of the executive team

  • Trusted by founders and shareholders

 

This independence allows them to mediate disagreements and maintain balanced decision-making. Without it, the Chair risks becoming simply another representative of one stakeholder group.

 

 

A great Chair brings pattern recognition
 

One of the biggest advantages of hiring an experienced Chair is pattern recognition.


They’ve seen:

 

  • Companies scale successfully

  • Boards become dysfunctional

  • Founder-investor tensions emerge

  • Strategic pivots succeed — or fail

 

That experience helps founders/CEOs navigate situations they may only encounter once. 


For example, we recently helped AI startup, Literal Labs, appoint Jim Darragh as Non-Executive Chair.

 

Darragh has more than 30 years of experience in B2B software, having served as CEO of five international technology businesses and led them to exits generating roughly £1.3bn in enterprise value.

 

For a company scaling a new generation of energy-efficient AI models, bringing in that level of growth experience can provide a valuable playbook.

 

As Literal Labs CEO, Noel Hurley, explained, “Jim is exactly the kind of person we wanted around the table at this stage of our journey. His track record of scaling international software businesses is exceptional, with more than a billion pounds of value created, and a genuine playbook for building teams that execute at pace.” 


 

Align Expectations Early

 

Before appointing a Chair, founders and investors should agree on:

 

  • Time commitment

  • Compensation (equity and/or fees)

  • Involvement between board meetings

  • How the Chair interacts with the CEO

 

Clear expectations early on prevent misunderstandings later.

 

 

Final Thoughts
 

The best Non-Executive Chairs don’t dominate the board; they make it work better. They create space for founders to lead, ensure investors are heard, and keep discussions focused on the decisions that matter most.

 

For startup leaders navigating the complexity of scaling a company, that kind of partner can be invaluable. But like any leadership hire, success comes down to timing, clarity of purpose, and choosing the right person.



 

If you’re thinking about appointing a Non-Executive Chair, we’re always happy to share perspectives from the work we do supporting startups and scaleups through these appointments.


Feel free to get in touch: contact@upscalepartners.com


 
 
bottom of page